Last month I had the opportunity to experience the ‘Uncrowded and Uncompromising’ tag line for myself on Eos Airlines, the new NYC/London service that has been creating quite the buzz lately. Eos flies 757’s usually outfitted for 220 people with only 48 guests — giving each flyer 21 square feet of personal space. They truly identified that despite how comfortable you make a seat, the area, space and environment around you are still just as important as the space you take up on your own.

I took just about every minute of my six hour flight (even before I boarded the plane to New York) to eat, sleep, read, entertain myself, hold an ‘in-flight meeting’ and really get a feel for the entire
experience.

Stanstead Airport and The Club 48 Lounge

If you like incredibly busy, loud, and obnoxious airports, stay at Heathrow. If you like a relatively small and peaceful place, Stanstead, the newer international hub is an hour and change outside of London, is your new spot. It’s fairly easy (and inexpensive) to get to via train from Kings Cross in Central London. Eos also offers chauffeur service of pretty good value. Cabs on the meter will end up running you in the 125+ GBP range — not worth it and a bad mistake (oops).

I only had a few minutes in the Club 48 lounge, but it had all the usual comforts you would expect: some good snacks, a full bar, WiFi and comfortable chairs and couches to relax in. One thing that did dawn on me when I walked in was “wow, this place is small”, and then realized: I’m about to board a massive Boeing 757, with only 48 other people. Turns out there were a few no-shows and only 40 of us on board. Spacious, indeed.

The Airplane Seat (AKA, the Suite)

The 48 seats on the plane are staggered in a way that nobody is sitting directly next to each-other, and almost disappear into their own cocoons with space on either side when reclined. This was a great change of scenery after flying in Virgin’s Upper Class, which although very comfortable, kept making me wonder how close I actually was to the person next to me (I call it luxury-sardine style seating). The seat itself was as comfortable sitting up as it was fully flat — and it was fully flat and horizontal, not one of the slanted-seat-nonsense other carriers seem to be selling. The best parts of the suite were the oversized tables (sturdy enough to hold a laptop and dinner for two), and the ability to have someone else in your space for a chat, or a meeting and still remain comfortable. The foot rest is actually the companion seat and is of decent size, even equipped with a seat belt of its own.

Getting Work Done

I don’t know any other airline or seat configuration that allows four people to comfortably converse over one table that isn’t a corporate jet or Air Force 1. After settling into my own seat, I popped back to visit a friend and we were able to have a informal meeting at 36,000 feet with enough room for a couple of drinks and both our laptops — sitting across a table from one another. Doing any type of business face-to-face is pretty key, so I welcomed the ability to leave behind the neck-creaking pain of trying to converse with someone for hours on end sitting next to them. Two full AC power outlets were in the side of the seat. No word on WiFi, but my fingers are crossed for its anticipated introduction. When internet is on board, I think working like this might be one of the most productive places ever. Private, uninterrupted, and comfortable with few distractions.

Entertainment

Eos hands out Bose Quiet Comfort headsets, and uses some kind of super touch screen think-pad type device — a ‘Personal Media Player’. The idea is really quite interesting and makes management of media very easy, but I’m not sure Eos, as a small airline, has the buying power to take advantage of the device. I found the movie and entertainment selection to be pretty slim, although I did almost lose my mind watching Jeremy Piven in Smokin’ Aces. My hope is the selection widens over time — it’s bound to happen. I did enjoy deciding where I wanted “my screen” to be, which afforded me the freedom to watch movies in all sorts of contorted positions (some more comfortable than others).

Snacks and Food

For the most part, I do my best to eat before I get on a long flight and bring enough good snacks to last the entire journey. I was hustling to the airport in the first place so I had no such luck — but the in-flight food beat my expectations. Although it wasn’t top-notch gourmet, I give them a round of applause for trying to replicate a 5-star dining experience at 37,000 feet. Cooking and reheating food on an airplane probably isn’t easy; I had a shrimp and scallop dish over rice which was very good and just enough to hold me over until I could find a proper meal on solid ground when I landed. The best part of the in-flight food on a service like Eos was that I could have it cooked for me when I asked for it…when I was hungry. Not before, not after.

Catching Some Zzzz’s

Sleep1 A bottom sheet, a couple down pillows and a nice duvet make all the difference when it comes to catching a proper nap on an airplane. So does getting horizontal. Let me reiterate the getting horizontal bit. Blood flow, breathing and the like can’t slow down unless your head and feet end up at the same level — sleeping on a slant is a big joke. Those things and a pair of good earplugs and I was pretty much set for my time in dreamland. Looking at the ceiling of a plane is a surreal experience, but the freedom and space around me made a pretty huge impact on my comfort level. I could have thrown a hissy-fit with my pillows over a bad game of counting sheep and nobody would have noticed.

Why I’d Fly Again, and Again, and Again

Point blank, Eos was private jet treatment at a very tiny fraction of a usually enormous “fractional ownership” cost. If you book in advance, a round trip flight will run you just over $3,000, which is literally 1/4 of what a flight on a Virgin, British Airways or other first class service will cost you. I believe the future of air travel isn’t in the majors, but a handful of small outfits dedicated to superior experience, value, and maintaining long-term customer relationships.

So, what was missing?

When they outfitted a fleet of 757’s with fresh interiors and 48 new ’suite’ like suites, they forgot to do much of anything with the lavatories — except a couple of flowers and some product. Still uses standard paper towels, still has the weird blue liquid in the toilet that reminds you of cartoons. What gives? My guess is the next battle in the sky will be about the bathrooms — when will someone innovate on a larger, more comfortable place to do your personal business?

Editor’s disclosure: I flew on this demo flight for free, and Eos is now a proud sponsor of this site. No, I was not paid a penny to write this article and I would pay (and will often) to fly with Eos again in the future.


adam Monday, 09.03.07 @ 11:21 am

We have the 21st century now. People finally start to realize that global warming and poverty are a problem. Or do they? 48 people in a plane designed for 220 does mean about 450% more space, but it also means about 450% more carbon dioxide emission per person. If you book in advance you can get a round trip for just over $3000? If you book an economy class British Airway flight you can pay just under $500! Unless you are 60 or suffer from a heart disease is it really worth paying the $2500 premium for the 6-hour flight? Maybe you can donate it to some charity?

Hey, why not fly economy class, keep the emissions low, perhaps buy some booze if you really need to relax, and put the $2500 to a better use?


oO Tuesday, 09.04.07 @ 12:03 am

Nice! Of course your carbon footprint just got multiplied by 4.5 (actually 5.5 X because of the no shows). But I guess EOS is the aeronautical equivalent of renting a white stretch hummer for a romantic date in vegas. Possibly with a little more style, but no less horribly from an environmental point of view.


Josh Spear Tuesday, 09.04.07 @ 1:18 pm

These carbon output comments are greatly appreciated– and well received. I found several resources to offset my own carbon emissions during the flight (even buying offets for 6 people, more than just my 1 seat through Conservation International), but I’d like to encourage the team at Eos to offset the emissions of the entire flight.

Does anyone have any resources to see how much this 757 emits during its flight to London?


adam Tuesday, 09.04.07 @ 3:41 pm

Aeroplane CO2 emissions:
http://micpohling.wordpress.com/2007/05/08/math-how-much-co2-released-by-aeroplane/

I couldn’t find the data for 757, I used the data for 737-400 instead:

CO2 emissions per km of a:
737-400: 9,36 kg
Hummer H2: 0,51 kg
BMW 1 series diesel: 0,12 kg

distance NY-London: 5584 km;

total emissions per person on this distance (assuming that only one person drives the cars and 46 people fly the plane):
737-400: 1136 kg
Hummer H2: 2859 kg
BMW 1: 670 kg

As you see driving a BMW 1 on the distance of 5584 km would actually have much less impact on the environment than flying a plane. However, as planes emit the CO2 directly into the higher parts of the atmosphere they tend to contribute to the global warming much more than cars. Therefore one can’t really say if the 2859 kg of CO2 emitted by the Hummer is actually worse than the 1136 kg emitted by the plane. I’d say that driving a car such as the BMW 1 series diesel for in 4 people has generally much less impact on the environment than flying a plane, even one carrying a higher number passengers.


Matt Wednesday, 09.05.07 @ 1:23 am

Despite your editorial disclaimer,

I do not understand how more readers do not see this as blatant advertorial despite your disclaimer, when you are advertising for the same company on your sidebar. How much is your sidebar ad worth? I bet it is relevant when negotiating the advertising deal.

Secondly this is the most fuel inefficient style of air travel, as others have mentioned. I dig Josh Spear, but this seems kinda diluted.


Sam Wednesday, 09.05.07 @ 3:31 am

Josh, it’s all very well you saying the comments are greatly appreciated and well received, but I’m disappointed by the obvious “blog time” you’re giving to such an eco-unfriendly enterprise. People like yourself have a lot of power, it’s such a shame that your mention of offsetting of emissions and your “encouragement” to the team at EOS to do this comes buried in the comments, as a somewhat feeble afterthought following your pro title of “Uncrowded. Uncompromised.”, and Adam’s concerned reply.

I question your eco credentials.

Regards.


Sam Wednesday, 09.05.07 @ 3:34 am

Ah I just noticed the EOS advertising on the right (Sponsored links).

It all makes sense. Shame.

Regards.


Josh Spear Wednesday, 09.05.07 @ 12:25 pm

Again, I can certainly acknowledge the eco-distress this article has created.

I never claimed to have eco-credentials, but can admit and agree– something certainly needs to be done about the amount of carbon created by not just Eos, but by all airplanes.

I’m a big flyer, as some of you may recall in a note I wrote back at the end of June, I actually am now 100% nomadic. That means no car, no home, no paper bills, and outside of airline travel, I carry a very small carbon foot print. My air travel is in the six figure mile range already. This site wouldn’t exist without the amount of travel and coverage I provide.

When I had the opportunity to try a new airline from NYC to London, a trip I’ve now taken more than half a dozen times this year alone– I thought, wow, maybe I’ll get some rest this time! My naiveté disregarded the carbon output, and in feeling bad upon some readers comments, I offset the equivalent of 6 roundtrip seats (a $94 donation to Conservation.org). I have mixed feelings on carbon offsets, but don’t see a much better action right now.

As far as comments about ‘advertorial’, I’m not quite sure why my disclosure was so unclear. Money buys advertising on this site, not editorial. Advertising keeps this site free. I very easily could have disliked the flight, and not written about it. Fact is, it was a pretty incredible experience!

Sorry this seemed to have put lots of readers into a tizzy. Now that you’ve got my attention, what should we do to get Eos’s attention to go green?


Susan Tuesday, 10.23.07 @ 1:42 pm

I’ve noted the comments about the carbon footprint, but it won’t stop me from trying this airline the next time I need to fly out of JFK to London. I’ve flown both British Air and Virgin Atlantic’s versions of First Class/Business Class, and I totally agree with Josh, I need to be able to be horizontal to sleep on a plane.

Second, everytime someone screams about emissions of a jet, I keep thinking of the number of flights per day Eos runs versus how many H2’s and BMW’s are driving MORE than 50 miles per day, every day, 365 per year. My real concern with this comparison is that while the airplane may be doing a bit more damage because it is emitting in the higher atmosphere, the H2 and the BMW are doing PERMANENT damage to my lungs, as well as everyone who reads this. I can’t take “green” seriously, and most of my friends can’t either, if I continue to hear the loudest complain about a service such as that Eos offers, and then the same complainer hops into their car to drive home. I limit my vehicle usage to around 100 miles per week.

Kudos for letting people know about this airline. I’ve looked into it. I’d love to see them fly a wider range of flights, but as it is, it will be my next mode of transportation to London (and I’ve gone so far as to ride the Queen Mary 2 when making the return trip).




Sponsorship:

Joshspear.com brings a dedicated, young, and influential audience to brand advertisers.

Please contact us for more information.

Regular content continued below...





The Shelter: Dubai
Dieter Rams: Less and More in London
Headed To Dubai
Kinetic Lights
We Are Handsome: Handmade Swimwear
Damien Hirst x Supreme
We Feel Fine: The Book
MOMO Y3 Video
Nokia Viral: N900
Japanese Bar Codes