I’m having a hard time separating my feelings about the upcoming Nike vintage running shoes themselves from the marketing campaign that surrounds them. For starters, it seems risky to go on record criticizing the fine men and women at the Swoosh given their stellar track record. The interwebs seem to have responded positively to the new campaign, so I feel obligated to expound a bit on my reaction aside from just offering a cliched meh. Making matters worse for potential critics of the new line, Nike brought in Junya Watanabe, one of the hottest designers among snearkerphiles. The results… well, the results are what you might expect — new sneakers that look like old running shoes. Or, more accurately, running shoes you would never actually wear running. Now, don’t get me wrong — I’m not some crazy half-wit that expects people to only wear sneakers while playing tennis nor am I stumping for a return of the blucher (although I hear it’s a good shoe for yachting). So, what are we left with…? We have a tongue-in-cheek marketing campaign cleverly designed around late-70s era fashion and fitness, headlined by Nike’s website promoting (and selling, starting on July 21) the new line of shoes. The site mixes parody with back story via a fictional issue of “Oregon Runner” magazine, and includes a number of ridiculous articles on this new fad called “jogging” (or is it “yogging”? it might be a soft “j”). I can’t help but feel like it’s all a bit forced. Are feathered mullets funny? I guess. Do they want to make me buy shoes, most of which look pretty ugly to me? Not really. Check it out for yourselves; I would be interested to hear what people think about both the shoes and the campaign.


Scott Rench Tuesday, 07.17.07 @ 9:53 am

I usually like your posts Mike but on this one you crashed and burned. These are a geared toward the urban hipster, the shoe aficionado or to the older set like myself who sported these the first go round. I think its great they are reissuing these, I only hope they reissue the original sock racer.


mike luce Thursday, 07.19.07 @ 10:48 pm

Thanks for your comment, Scott. I can’t imagine you were the only reader with that reaction. I don’t doubt that you are mostly correct regarding Nike’s target demographic (although I’m a little skeptical that many folks who were around to purchase the originals in the 70s will bother to pick these up). I recognize that my point of view may seem surprising, but when it comes to these shoes… I ain’t buyin’.

The marketing campaign surrounding the line seems unimaginative. While the “Oregon Runner” mag may look better in print, the online version leaves me cold. For example, part of the site includes an iron-on T-shirt design advertising “Mustache Rides”. You can buy a similar shirt in any mall in America. Even though its DIY, it’s still not hip or very funny. My other objection is with the shoes themselves – while they went back to the original designs (kind of sweet), each shoe has been treated to appear aged. (And thus look even uglier, in my opinion.) “Fake” vintage ts and jeans are frequent targets of derision… so why should Nike get a free pass?

I don’t doubt that some sneakerheads and Nike fans will snatch these up… and that’s all well and good, I suppose. Who knows? Maybe I’ll spot a hipster sporting them in a few weeks at my favorite dive bar and change my mind. But I doubt it.

I appreciate the feedback!

Cheers…


Robert Wednesday, 07.25.07 @ 6:47 pm

Nike’s Vintage Running line is long overdue. Jean manufacturers have sold destroyed jeans for well over a decade now. It only makes sense to have a pair of faux vintage athletic shoes to wear with them. Seriously, don’t modern sneakers look dreadful with a pair of jeans these days? Especially with all the silver and patent leather and plastic these manufacturers are forcing down our throats.

It’s a shame these shoe manufacturers can’t get a clue and offer the vintage treatment with modern shoe technology. Comfortable and rustic. That’s why New Balance’s 992s are so popular. The 992 is the only suede runner on the market with modern shoe design where it counts, underneath your foot. I wish Nike would counter with something similar. There’s no doubt they have the ability to come up with something better.

I just received a pair of gray and purple Daybreaks from Nike’s vintage line and they are fun to wear. I’m 36 years old. I’m old enough to remember shoes from the early ’80s, and they weren’t much different from the ones in the ’70s. I’m sick of silver. I’m sick of all the shiny junk I see on athletic shoes these days. I wanted to get back to basics, and I did, sort of. I like the vintage twist. Brand new, perfect, sparkling sneakers bore me. Leave that for the gym.

As for the ad campaign, I agree, the effort is a bit strained. The hairstyle for the female model isn’t historically accurate. It would’ve been better if she had a Farrah since that was THE look in the late ’70s. Nike’s ad people missed this important detail, but the kids they’re marketing to don’t know the difference, so they’ll skate by. It sure seems annoying though.

The t-shirt iron-ons are plain ridiculous. And I don’t think anyone under the age of 30 will be astute enough to wear the shoes with 100 percent cotton sweats like I will this fall, nor will they have enough knowledge of the 1970s to place a reflective sticker on the heel of the shoes to give them that extra bit of authenticity. Remember that? Nike’s ad people should have. They could have explained it on their website and packaged reflectors with the shoes.


Seth Saturday, 05.31.08 @ 10:58 pm

I like them and I think that they are a great idea expecially for those that can’t find a pair of vintage shoes like this for sale on ebay in my size. That and the fact that I now don’t have to wear someone elses dirty shoes…. Way to go Nike…. They have brought back the Mustang Camaro Charger and now cool sneeks to go with them…


David Gettis Friday, 03.20.09 @ 9:37 pm

I was apparently oblivious to this campaign in ‘07 because it’s now on the verge of spring ‘09 and I’ve just discovered that these shoes were released. I’m 28 and in love with some pairs, mainly the Daybreak, LD 1000 and what looks to be the later-released Elite Retro and LDV. Unfortunately, size 12 is practically sold out everywhere and I’ve been looking high and low to get certain color/model variations. The search continues. The Daybreak in black and white is on the top of my list. A+ to Nike for this effort – I only wish I was aware of it when it was actually launched. I won’t touch a modern day Nike, but I’ll touch the modern day versions of their ’70s line, and then some. The hunt continues…




Sponsorship:

Joshspear.com brings a dedicated, young, and influential audience to brand advertisers.

Please contact us for more information.

Regular content continued below...





Zeitgiest Toys
Zimoun Sound Sculptures
Common Projects Duffle
Buddy Carr x Antonio Carusone
Flashback: Retro Design
Black Noise: Awesome Music Video
Papercraft Self Portrait
The Reverb Solar Powered iPod Dock
Outlier Clothing
Blockhead: The Music Scene