This morning, on the way to the coffee shop where I write, I passed a young lady with headphones in her ears. A normal enough occurrence for a rainy Friday morning, but the feeling that something was terribly out of place plagued me until we finally passed at the walk light, when I saw that her headphones were attached to… a CD player. Also normal enough, right? Right? On paper, I think I could have taken that in without too much mental distress; why, then, should my brain subconsciously register a product (that still occupies a very valid amount of Target shelf space) as alien, or at the very least, unusual?

The success of the iPod is something we are all well aware of. However, how a product actually revolutionizes its category (or creates a completely new one), is something slightly less comprehensible. In today’s icky world of convergence vs. divergence, we are daily bombarded with poorly-contrived, “breakthrough” products that serve to complicate, not simplify, our lives. The ones that lose send us running back to our old standbys; the ones that win force us to move along.

Aside from the iPod, I can think of few products (in my lifetime, anyway) that have truly made their predecessors irrelevant. Excess is theme in the U.S. — no shock there — but what keeps the ball rolling is our pursuit of the next big thing. So, for today’s TSF, we’d like to know: is there any product at all, either currently in production or still undeveloped, that you see as potentially/realistically life-changing? Are you aching for a fridge/laptop combo? Hands-free Vespa? Are you sick of this crap?


Easton Friday, 07.27.07 @ 12:02 pm

As of this moment I can’t think of any products that will make their predecessors truly irrelevant. However, in my lifetime I definitely feel like CD’s have made tapes irrelevant and to some extent e-commerce has made shopping at brick & mortar stores less relevant (see: Tower Records).


jme Friday, 07.27.07 @ 12:53 pm

High-speed broadband + set top boxes like Apple TV will be a gamechanger. We will move away from broadcast to tv shows and movies a la carte and on-demand. Joost is the closest conceptually to where things are headed, but it is still only a software solution doomed (for now) to the pc monitor.

Broadband in the US is still not fast or available enough (i.e. ftth), and there are not enough complete solutions (online store + solid content + hardware) out there other than apple tv, which seems for now to be slightly ahead of its time…


Bud Caddell Friday, 07.27.07 @ 1:16 pm

I still use a CD player. I’m not sure why though. It doesn’t exactly fit every other habit in my life.. but there’s something about letting go of physical albums (i have a turntable too) that really bothers me. I need to hear the album front to back, and over again, so I really hear it. Being able to skip around and ’shuffle’ as the kids say, would not give me the opportunity to study the music as I like.

I also don’t want to re-rip the 3,000 albums on my computer anytime soon.


JC Friday, 07.27.07 @ 1:19 pm

Actually, I still prefer my CD player.

I have yet to meet an MP3 player (iPod included) that hit on all fronts: design (external), UI, size, and quality.

The iPod, for example, locks me into iTunes (which I hate for various reasons), and has that annoying wheel (a single up/down thumb pad that was pressure sensitive — i.e., the harder you press the faster you scroll — would make FAR more sense than requiring excess and unnecessary motion). Plus, built in, non-replaceable batteries are a big turn off. And an ideal music player would also support compact flash cards and wifi.

So for all that, I still use my CD player and make mixes. I feel bad about creating more waste (or at least using more material, since I’m not in the habit of burning CDs and then throwing them out), but for me, my CD player is still the best device for listening to music.


onethousandohms Friday, 07.27.07 @ 3:06 pm

More of a process rather than a product but…remember that movie S1m0ne with Al Pacino in it? It seems like we are really close to getting there, which to me seems pretty revolutionary, Angelina Jolie (see Beowulf) for instance could just be paid for her likeness and would never have to act a day in her life. I don’t know though, maybe that logic is backwards.

Also, I cite two things (besides the whole increased sensory interaction thing) as evidence that video games are pretty much the future of entertainment (which means to me a reversal of sorts in relation to the current day Movie / Video Game market share percentages):

1) all of the money flowing in from big time Hollywood producers (see Spielberg’s EA contract and Lucas’ LDAC focuses).

2) and the newly announced method of real time advertising within the games themselves (I am sure Google is so on top of this with their target marketing).


Josh Ehr Saturday, 07.28.07 @ 6:55 pm

Honestly, I think all of Google’s advertising opportunities to be pretty brilliant. It basically allows anyone to have, at minimum, a break-even presence on the internet. In the same vein, I expect YouTube revolutionize broadcasting. That, plus the aforementioned Broadband/Apple TV combo look to make subscribing to cable obsolete.

Beyond that, I genuinely think that the roomba, which I sadly have not used, will be looked at as the beginning of robots entrance into our households. Devices that free me from doing chores I hate at a reasonable price?…it just seems like such a lucrative market.


Dee Sunday, 07.29.07 @ 12:01 pm

Anything that allows us all to get rid of all the damn cables and power chargers we need for electronic devices. I envision that one day anything electronic will all have a standardised power plug with no need to cart around the multiple cables we have today. If they design it to be compact and light and also have intl plugs built in as well I’d be a happy girl. The bulk of my damn carryon bacg when I travel is filled with these things because god forbid I get stuck in limbo somewhere without a way to keep my iPhone, laptop, secondary mobile, or digital camera charged. I need this NOW.


M@ Monday, 07.30.07 @ 11:40 am

Actually, I would have to say that the multi-touch interface will (or at least has the potential to) change our lives. Once the technology becomes affordable enough to integrate into tables, walls, blah blah blah, the idea of a keyboard and mouse as a physical object will become obselete.

And there is a product currently in production (I can’t mention the name as it’s not finalized and I know the CEO) which is a paintable digital screen. The paint itself carries a charge, and the particles in the paint are able to change colours on a (pretty much) microscopic level. Kinda like a chameleon when he’s stressed out. *(Currently, the particles aren’t stable enough to maintain that colour for any serious length of time, and I believe the paint heats up a bit too much in the process, but HOW FUCKING COOL!)

The military has snatched this up to utilize in conjunction with cameras. Their idea is that a camera on side A of an object can capture an image and in realtime send that data to the paint on side B, thus rendering the object “invisible”.

However, this has massive ramifications for personal use. Once perfected, your wall will be your TV. Your screensaver will be your wallpaper. Want the window moved? do so in the interface. Want your car to match your outfit? BOOM.

The idea of making a choice and having to live with it will be lost.




Sponsorship:

Joshspear.com brings a dedicated, young, and influential audience to brand advertisers.

Please contact us for more information.

Regular content continued below...





New Setgo
Cool Capitals: Francine & Her 5 Husbands
Toifu Taxidermy
rummble
Tenue de Nimes: Denim Superstore
Les Deglingos
3form’s Three for Three contest
These Creatures
WeSC x Nokia XpressMusic
Snowball Blaster