A couple of months ago, the Balmuda Design Floater for notebook computers made a rampant run across the design blogs. Undoubtedly, it’s a beautifully designed, functional piece that’s been well thought out. But at $305 for a notebook stand, who’s really in a rush to buy one?

A company called Power Support makes its own cooling stand of similar design, made to hold a notebook upright and out of the way. While it lacks some of the finer touches such as the cable cutouts and the curved edges, it also costs considerably less than Balmuda’s piece, at $40.

Now I appreciate well-designed stuff (yes, that is a technical term) as much as the next guy. I’ll gladly spend a little extra for good design when I can afford to, even if it means saving for a while longer. In this case though, can anyone really justify paying seven times more for the extra thought that went into Balmuda’s piece rather than Power Support’s stand? Where does “good design” shoot itself in the foot by pricing itself beyond the competition? And just how far are you willing to stretch yourself to bring high-end design into your life? Tell us in the comments, because it’s Talk Shop Friday.


Anthony Friday, 08.10.07 @ 10:45 am

Indeed they do shoot themselves in the foot. Multiple times, actually. Just look at furniture prices.


JCK Friday, 08.10.07 @ 11:38 am

To be totally honest, Power Support’s stand is _far_ more aesthetically pleasing. It’s no contest.

(That said, there is no way I would ever, ever, ever pay money for a laptop stand. What a silly invention.)


Jason Friday, 08.10.07 @ 3:05 pm

I guess if I didn’t think $300 was a ridiculous amount of money to spend on a laptop stand in the first place, I would be willing to pay for good design.


Erica Friday, 08.10.07 @ 3:50 pm

I think there are other contributing factors that can make good design worth the cost. For example, when a designer honors excellence in manufacturing then those costs have to be passed on and a lot of people understand that. For example (yes, there’s a plug coming) my own sleek dog collars are made in Florence, Italy and NOT China, so they have to cost about $400. But again, they are made by hand entirely in Italy with French leather. Good design AND good manufacturing cost more.


Eric Friday, 08.10.07 @ 5:16 pm

Maybe it’s not just good design. Maybe it’s “art”… Does it make more sense that art costs more than good design? I suppose it might if you think that art is purely sensory indulgence and design requires aspects of functionality, then an entirely indulgent object might fetch exorbitant prices.


Jason Friday, 08.10.07 @ 5:43 pm

Its nice but not 300 nice. I would only pay top dollar for designs to truly make a difference. If it was just stand I would use the cheaper one. Really how often is it going to be used and is the extra cutouts worth a few hundred? I am sure if you tried hard enough you could DIY.


Rob Friday, 08.10.07 @ 5:52 pm

If an object is “art,” it should have some chance to grow in value, like Eames chairs. I think these are the exceptions of design, rather than the rule.
My swatch has exceptional design, but is no work of art. However, my bosses Panerai Luminor is art.
At the end of the day, though, isn’t design about improving the interaction between person and surroundings? I feel that making a bitchin’ product that is cost-prohibitive is self-defeating. Exceptions exist.


rustafari Monday, 08.13.07 @ 11:20 pm

right on to that… i’m a design fiend, but there comes a point where high-art becomes stuffy and not accessible. and when people can’t access it because of the price, it’s not good design to me. thanks for the good thoughts!




Sponsorship:

Joshspear.com brings a dedicated, young, and influential audience to brand advertisers.

Please contact us for more information.

Regular content continued below...





The Shelter: Dubai
Dieter Rams: Less and More in London
Headed To Dubai
Kinetic Lights
We Are Handsome: Handmade Swimwear
Damien Hirst x Supreme
We Feel Fine: The Book
MOMO Y3 Video
Nokia Viral: N900
Japanese Bar Codes